A long, detailed, and nuanced discussion of the affair between Galileo and the Church may be found here. Part of the interest is in the exposure of some of the "mythology" that surround this issue. Such as this:

According to one of these readings, Galileo knew the Earth to go round the Sun, as Copernicus had written, rather than the converse as implied in several Biblical passages. The Church would not allow science to disprove the revealed truth of Scripture, however, and hence threw Galileo to the Inquisition where he was forced under threat of torture to disclaim this opinion and never speak of it again. He was then imprisoned under house arrest for the remainder of his life, a clear example of the conflict between scientific investigation of the world around us and the presumed infallible authority of the Bible.

Which is a story often cited as the truth of history.

A comic.

Double comic after a long break!

Double comic. There are two.

10 Remarkable Female Mathematicians

I wrote a post much like this one, a while back.
The post is here.

Mathy comics

In Questionable Content, Hannelore reveals one of her hobbies: theoretical knitting. If you've ever wondered why bubble-form tests ask you to use a #2 pencil, XKCD reveals the awful truth. And Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal pits A 17th Century Explorer vs. Calculus.

Science, meet Politics. Charmed, I'm sure

This was never meant to be a political blog, but what happens now will become history. And in this day and age, scientific research is intertwined with politics. So yeah. I can't think of anything witty to say.

A 29th twofer.

First, an interesting little article on a very strange research project that, strangely, seems to have produced some results. Strange ones. Basically, they are trying to map personality traits according to geography in the US.

Second, an article about the mistakes made by Einstein. This, in my opinion, is an important thing to write and read about, because it defuses the idea that science is ideology. If a physicist whose name and countenance are symbols of intelligence itself can be shown to have been wrong - well, that's only to be expected really.

All the other great scientists of the past were wrong about things, because advancing the state of the art in knowledge is like that - better theories, better data, better models - but never The Truth. Just a useful approximation. This is the power and glory of science: to recognize and correct its errors.

This is why I dislike terms such as "Darwinism" and "evolutionism" so intensely. They attempt to crystallize the ever changing ideas of how species originate into an ideology that, if somehow shown to be false, can then be defeated. It surely must be comforting for opponents of science and knowledge to think that this could possibly work. However, they are just as wrong about this as they are about so many other things.