The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning - Part 2

Part 1

Continuing on the the second page, we find that

In all ages and countries where learning has prevailed, the mathematical sciences have been looked upon as the most considerable branch of it. The very name "Mathematician" implies no less, by which they were called either for their excellency or because of all the sciences they were first taught, or because they were judged to comprehend "all things mathematical". 

I'm no scholar of Greek, so I'm taking a bit of a liberty with what I think Arbuthnot was trying to say here. I do know that the original Greek word from which the term "mathematics" is derived has senses of meaning "what is learned." So it's not really surprising that he goes on to write

And amongst those that are commonly reckoned to be the seven Liberal Arts, four are mathematical, to wit, Arithmetic, Music, Astronomy, and Geometry.

He is referring here to the Quadrivium, which was the second course of study in the medieval university. The first was the Trivium, and consisted of Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric. Of course, contemporary people don't really think of music as a mathematical study, even though things like rhythm, pitch, tempo, and duration can all be quantified, and despite the explicitly mathematical origins of the art in the Western tradition starting with Pythagoras.

Not only that, logic actually is a branch of mathematics now, but wasn't in the 17th century. It started to be formalized as a mathematical study in a serious way by thinkers such as Boole, Pierce, and Russell.

In the next part, the author starts to describe why he thinks people don't learn math as much as they should.

But notwithstanding their excellency and reputation, they have not been taught nor studied so universally as some of the rest, which I take to have proceeded from the following causes:

The reasons he gives all sound very modern: people don't like to think so hard, they don't realize how useful math is, they think that only geniuses can learn it, it is not encouraged, and there aren't enough good teachers.

The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning - Part 1

I have, for quite some time, admired "An Essay on the Usefulness of Mathematical Learning in a Letter from a Gentleman in the City to his Friend in Oxford."

Though it was first printed in 1701, the arguments it makes are remarkably modern sounding - possibly because the time we live in actually has a lot in common with the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

So I think that this book is worth reading, but the format, typesetting, and 17th century usage make it tricky. Therefore, I will transcribe it into slightly more modern English while doing my best to preserve the tone and rhythm of the prose. Also, I mean to offer such commentary as may be useful to a student who endeavors to fully comprehend the import of the argument.

I think I'm in the spirit now, so here we go.

AN

ESSAY

ON

The Usefulness of

MATHEMATICAL LEARNING, &c.

Sir,

I am glad to hear from you that the study of the Mathematics is promoted and encouraged among the youth of your university. The great influence, which these sciences have on Philosophy and all useful learning, as well as the concerns of the public, may sufficiently recommend them to your choice and consideration: and the particular advantages, which you of that place enjoy, give us just reason to expect from you a suitable improvement in them. I have here sent you some short reflections upon the usefulness of mathematical learning which may serve as an argument to incite you to a closer and more vigorous pursuit of it.

A long, detailed, and nuanced discussion of the affair between Galileo and the Church may be found here. Part of the interest is in the exposure of some of the "mythology" that surround this issue. Such as this:

According to one of these readings, Galileo knew the Earth to go round the Sun, as Copernicus had written, rather than the converse as implied in several Biblical passages. The Church would not allow science to disprove the revealed truth of Scripture, however, and hence threw Galileo to the Inquisition where he was forced under threat of torture to disclaim this opinion and never speak of it again. He was then imprisoned under house arrest for the remainder of his life, a clear example of the conflict between scientific investigation of the world around us and the presumed infallible authority of the Bible.

Which is a story often cited as the truth of history.

Mathematical Personalities: Gerolamo Cardano

Sorry about the lack of updates, but the life has been busy.

Down to business.

The Italian Renaissance was one of those interesting times in world history in which the great increase in knowledge and trade led to an explosion of wealth, which led to more knowledge and trade, and so on...but we have to remember that these are not modern people. This was a time that was altogether more violent and chaotic than anything we see today (in the Western world, anyway) because for some reason the people of that time and place really knew how to work the chaos into something rather creative. I mentioned Cardano before, but in the context of the solution to the cubic equation, which is a great story. Now I want to mention some other things about the man. The events of his life illustrate the differences between that era and this.

Remember that the modern world comes largely from the Enlightenment with heavy doses of Modernism and Postmodernism thrown into the mix. This all happened after the Renaissance, and the 16th century was more like the medieval world than like ours. His mother fled the plague. He had trouble starting a career in medicine because his parents were not married. He was a gambler and wrote a book on the subject that was the first to make probability into a science. While he contributed to the sciences and mathematics, he was an astrologer as well and was arrested for heresy after casting the horoscope of Jesus.

People who are brilliant enough to make lasting contributions to mathematics have a tendency to be eccentric. Add to this the fact that many discoveries were made before what we would call the modern era, and we find that the people of the history of mathematics are incredible to study.